Nothing is what Ben Bernanke is offering in terms of additional stimulus from the Federal Reserve. Joe Gagnon suggests three things the Fed could do:
- Lower the interest rate the Fed pays banks on reserves from 0.25 percent to zero
- Purchase three year Treasury securities in sufficient quantity to achieve a target rate of 0.25 percent (versus 0.90 percent now)
- Establish a facility to allow banks to borrow for terms up to 24 months at an interest rate of 0.25 percent
He claims that
These measures are all within the Federal Reserve's established powers. They pose essentially no risk to the Fed's balance sheet. They would reduce unemployment roughly as much as a 2-year $600 billion fiscal package and yet they would actually reduce the federal budget deficit. And they can be reversed quickly should the balance of risks shift from deflation to inflation.
I'd be interested to know where he got the $600 billion figure - it seems wildly optimistic. Nevertheless, if the Fed did those things it would be better than nothing. I'd add that the Fed could begin charging banks for holding reserves (does anything in the legislation authorizing the Fed to pay interest on reserves require that that interest rate be positive?) as a way of encouraging banks to lend rather than hold idle reserves.
But even so, I think the Fed's ability to influence the economy is very constrained at this point. The Fed's quantitative easing has brought long-term interest rates to historically low levels. Specific intervention in the mortgage and commercial paper markets has brought spreads in those markets down dramatically. Corporate bond spreads are also at normal recession (not normal recovery) levels, but unless the Fed starts buying up corporate bonds in massive quantities there's not much it can do there.
The biggest obstacles to strong recovery now are consumer spending, the housing sector, lack of availability of credit for small businesses, state and local government finances, and employment. This is the job for fiscal policy, not monetary policy.
Pages
Better than nothing
Monday, April 23, 2012
Posted by
follow me
in Economics theme:
Ben Bernanke,
economics,
Federal Reserve,
fiscal policy,
monetary policy
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Info recommended by:
Economic articles
and Economics online journal |
Sponsored by:
Economics issues,
Online economics
and Economic tips and online posts
Save
Better than nothing
on social network:
Categories
Followers
Popular Posts
-
As USA Today recently pointed out , a new study published in the journal Nature Geoscience shows that the models of CO2 and global warming ...
-
This Forbes article about opposition to the bill moving through the Pennsylvania legislature to private the state liquor stores was reprint...
-
As I have repeatedly pointed out, China is in better shape than the U.S. and many other Western countries, but all is not rosy in China . CN...
-
Matthew Yglesias also notes the bizarre disappearance of a carbon tax from the debate over the debt ceiling. This is another Democratic fai...
-
I'm watching the Senate Finance Committee hearings on the Rockefeller amendment to include a "public option" in the Finance Co...
-
Scott Ritter was right about WMD in Iraq. I suggest that we give him a better hearing now with Iran . While this action is understandably ve...
-
Inquiring minds have been investigating the property bubble down under and are asking the question "How Safe is Australia's Banking...
-
The Washington Post is saying the emperor has no clothes, and calling the Obama administration's bluff that the winter of the financial...
-
In an article entitled "Should USA still be AAA?", CNN writes : According to credit rating agency Moody's, the amount of U.S. ...
-
So now it looks like the Democrats, rather than just telling anti-abortion people that if they want to require that insurance plans people b...
0 comments:
Post a comment on: Better than nothing