In what amounts to the ultimate irony a judge ruled yesterday that a bidding process that awarded a Hunts Point site to Baldor's Foods was invalid because the city had in essence rigged the bid in favor of Baldor's in order to solve its political snafu with the BTM merchants. So the merchants who fought long and hard, yet unsuccessfully, to remain in the BTM now get to be the source of at least one legal victory.
As the NY Sun reports this morning Randy Mastro, the lawyer for the Hunts Point Produce Cooperative, had argued that the whole bid process was a sham: "The city conducted a sham competition, when it had in mind all along that it wanted to steer the property to Baldor." Now we have no doubt that the process was rigged, just as the awarding of the BTM site was to Related, yet we seriously doubt that the reason for the collusion was the plight of the BTM merchants, as much as our agreement with the premise would credit the work that the Alliance did on the merchants behalf.
To agree would be to acknowledge that the city at any point gave a tinker's dam about the plight of the merchants. The reality is it never did and EDC was upfront about its lack of concern. We believe that the "offer" of the abandoned Baldor's site was strictly an afterthought since the city never had any prior discussions with the merchants prior to the Baldor's relocation announcement.
That is why the comment by merchant rep Stanley Mayer in the NY Times this morning is right on point. "Mr. Mayer said that almost all the merchants knew where they were going but none of them planned to move to the Baldor's building. 'It's beyond ironic,' he said."
Hats off, however, to Mastro and to Judge Lucy Adams Billings who saw the collusion and moved to put a stop to it. Maybe Judge Cahn should take a new look at his travesty of a legal ruling that ceded the BTM to Related. There's as much chance of that happening as finding Judge Crater.
Pages
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Info recommended by:
Economic articles
and Economics online journal |
Sponsored by:
Economics issues,
Online economics
and Economic tips and online posts
Save
BTM Merchants Win!
on social network:
Categories
Followers
Popular Posts
-
As USA Today recently pointed out , a new study published in the journal Nature Geoscience shows that the models of CO2 and global warming ...
-
This Forbes article about opposition to the bill moving through the Pennsylvania legislature to private the state liquor stores was reprint...
-
As I have repeatedly pointed out, China is in better shape than the U.S. and many other Western countries, but all is not rosy in China . CN...
-
Matthew Yglesias also notes the bizarre disappearance of a carbon tax from the debate over the debt ceiling. This is another Democratic fai...
-
I'm watching the Senate Finance Committee hearings on the Rockefeller amendment to include a "public option" in the Finance Co...
-
Scott Ritter was right about WMD in Iraq. I suggest that we give him a better hearing now with Iran . While this action is understandably ve...
-
Inquiring minds have been investigating the property bubble down under and are asking the question "How Safe is Australia's Banking...
-
The Washington Post is saying the emperor has no clothes, and calling the Obama administration's bluff that the winter of the financial...
-
In an article entitled "Should USA still be AAA?", CNN writes : According to credit rating agency Moody's, the amount of U.S. ...
-
So now it looks like the Democrats, rather than just telling anti-abortion people that if they want to require that insurance plans people b...
0 comments:
Post a comment on: BTM Merchants Win!