In today's NY Time$ the columnist Paul Krugman lashes out against the Wal-Mart war on workers' wages. In fact, he sees the Wal-Mart campaign to cut labor costs as part of a national trend by employers all across the country. As he points out, "But after tax profits have more than doubled, because workers' productivity is up, but their wages aren't..."
Krugman sees Wal-Mart as the exemplar of this national trend; "The problem from the company's point of view, then, is that its workers are too loyal; it wants cheap labor that doesn't hang around too long, but not enough workers quit before acquiring the right to higher wages and benefits." In order to accomplish this the company is seeking to raise the number of its part-time workers from 20% to 40%.
Another aspect of the strategy is to impose wage caps on the workers and to find ways to make older workers more discomfited so that they no longer will stick around. As Krugman observes, "It is a brutal strategy." In the past this would have sparked a fierce and successful union organizing drive but for the fact that "the people who are supposed to enforce labor laws are on the side of the employers..."
The key point in all of this is that the glittering promise of low prices is a fools gold illusion that is built on the foundation of a corporate philosophy that sees workers as a "disposable commodity, paid as little as possible and encouraged to leave after a year or two." This is a clear message to the good folks in New York City and its neighbors up in Rockland who are looking at the prospect of a Walmonster in Monsey.
Wal-Mart will destroy companies that are paying good wages and benefits-supermarkets such as Pathmark, Shoprite, Key Foods and A&P- while at the same time wiping out immigrant and ethnic entrepreneurs who own the independent stores in the areas surrounding the invading box store. This is precisely the " Big Box Swindle" that our friend Stacy Mitchell has written so eloquently about. It certainly is no bargain for any community.
Pages
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Info recommended by:
Economic articles
and Economics online journal |
Sponsored by:
Economics issues,
Online economics
and Economic tips and online posts
Save
Wal-Mart's Wager: Bad Bet for Anyone
on social network:
Categories
Followers
Popular Posts
-
As USA Today recently pointed out , a new study published in the journal Nature Geoscience shows that the models of CO2 and global warming ...
-
This Forbes article about opposition to the bill moving through the Pennsylvania legislature to private the state liquor stores was reprint...
-
As I have repeatedly pointed out, China is in better shape than the U.S. and many other Western countries, but all is not rosy in China . CN...
-
Matthew Yglesias also notes the bizarre disappearance of a carbon tax from the debate over the debt ceiling. This is another Democratic fai...
-
I'm watching the Senate Finance Committee hearings on the Rockefeller amendment to include a "public option" in the Finance Co...
-
Scott Ritter was right about WMD in Iraq. I suggest that we give him a better hearing now with Iran . While this action is understandably ve...
-
Inquiring minds have been investigating the property bubble down under and are asking the question "How Safe is Australia's Banking...
-
The Washington Post is saying the emperor has no clothes, and calling the Obama administration's bluff that the winter of the financial...
-
In an article entitled "Should USA still be AAA?", CNN writes : According to credit rating agency Moody's, the amount of U.S. ...
-
So now it looks like the Democrats, rather than just telling anti-abortion people that if they want to require that insurance plans people b...
0 comments:
Post a comment on: Wal-Mart's Wager: Bad Bet for Anyone