So now Russ Feingold and Barbara Boxer have announced that they will not support Ben Bernanke's reappointment as chair of the Federal Reserve, putting his reappointment in jeopardy. No good can come out of this, none at all.
Bernanke screwed up during the bubble years but has since then performed heroically. He has ticked people off by being coy about the Fed's future stimulus efforts - maybe the Fed will keep rates low as the economy recovers, maybe it'll start raising rates this year when the economy heats up. The possibility that the Fed would tighten significantly before we get a meaningful recovery is a real concern. And maybe Bernanke has been too cozy with banks.
But Bernanke is not the problem here, it's the Fed as an institution and the hypersensitivity of financial markets to every utterance that comes from the Fed. Any plausible candidate for the job will be equally reticent about keeping the spigots open while the economy recovers. You simply cannot be taken seriously at the Fed or in the financial markets if you take a relaxed attitude toward inflation.
What are the upsides and downsides of appointment someone else to take Bernanke's place? On the upside, you might get a guy who is marginally more willing to keep interest rates low than Bernanke. Maybe he (more likely she - Sheila Bair at FDIC is probably on Democrats' short list) may take a slightly tougher line as bank regulator. But the upside seems pretty modest to me.
The downside, on the other hand -- hoo boy! I do not want to see the Dow fall 500 points on concerns about leadership at the Fed or the Fed's independence from Congress. I do not want to see bond yields jump a hundred basis points. I do not want to see the dollar plunge in foreign currency markets. I do not want everyone in the world wondering why the hell they put Democrats in charge of running the country.
Just confirm Bernanke, for God's sake.
Pages
Circular firing squad department
Saturday, October 22, 2011
Posted by
follow me
in Economics theme:
Ben Bernanke,
Congress,
economics,
Federal Reserve,
monetary policy,
politics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Info recommended by:
Economic articles
and Economics online journal |
Sponsored by:
Economics issues,
Online economics
and Economic tips and online posts
Save
Circular firing squad department
on social network:
Categories
Followers
Popular Posts
-
As USA Today recently pointed out , a new study published in the journal Nature Geoscience shows that the models of CO2 and global warming ...
-
This Forbes article about opposition to the bill moving through the Pennsylvania legislature to private the state liquor stores was reprint...
-
As I have repeatedly pointed out, China is in better shape than the U.S. and many other Western countries, but all is not rosy in China . CN...
-
Matthew Yglesias also notes the bizarre disappearance of a carbon tax from the debate over the debt ceiling. This is another Democratic fai...
-
I'm watching the Senate Finance Committee hearings on the Rockefeller amendment to include a "public option" in the Finance Co...
-
Scott Ritter was right about WMD in Iraq. I suggest that we give him a better hearing now with Iran . While this action is understandably ve...
-
Inquiring minds have been investigating the property bubble down under and are asking the question "How Safe is Australia's Banking...
-
The Washington Post is saying the emperor has no clothes, and calling the Obama administration's bluff that the winter of the financial...
-
In an article entitled "Should USA still be AAA?", CNN writes : According to credit rating agency Moody's, the amount of U.S. ...
-
So now it looks like the Democrats, rather than just telling anti-abortion people that if they want to require that insurance plans people b...
0 comments:
Post a comment on: Circular firing squad department